Why Net Zero and Offsets won't solve the climate crisis
文章推薦指數: 80 %
Within the climate debate, the biggest deception comes down to a single word: net. Greenpeace Luxembourg activists use human size yellow slipper ... SkiptoNavigation SkiptoContent SkiptoFooter Closenavigationmobilemenu Home Act Explore Makeadonation Thisisahistoricmoment–acrisisthatrequiresgovernmentstoacttogetherinanunprecedentedwaytoensureafutureforalllifeonEarth.Itcanallbedone,ifweonlychoosetodoso. Instead,whatweareseeingfromgovernmentsisaplethoraofexcuses,greenwashing,andinaction.Withintheclimatedebate,thebiggestdeceptioncomesdowntoasingleword:net. GreenpeaceLuxembourgactivistsprotestcontinuedfossilfuelinvestmentinLuxembourg.©SaraPozaAlvarez/Greenpeace Theproblemwith‘net’ Countingthingsinanetwaycanbeveryhelpfulbutitcanalsobetotallymisleading,likewhenthedeclineofourforestsiscountedasnetforestloss,suggestingthatclearingoldgrowthforestscanbecompensatedforbyplantingmonoculturetreeplantations. Thissamedeceptiveapproachispromotedincountlessclimatepledgesofgovernmentsandcorporationsas‘NetZero’or‘CarbonNeutrality’.Whiletheambitioninalltheseplansvarieswidely,theyhaveonemajorflawincommon:theassumptionthatcarbonsafelystoredinfossilfuelsisequaltothecarbonintheatmosphere,livingorganisms,topsoils,andtheoceans.Itisnot. Sohowdocarbonstoreswork? Carboninfossilfuelsispermanentlylockedawayandonlycontributestoclimatechangewhenhumansextractandburnit.Oncereleasedfromthesestores,itconstantlymovesaroundcirclingbetweenair,water,soils,andlivingbeings,largelyoutofourcontrol.Onceintheatmosphereitheatsupourclimatesowemuststopburningthesefuelsinthefirstplace.Inaddition,weneedtomovecarbonfromtheatmospheretootherplaces,forexampletreesandsoils,ifwearetostaywithinmoderateclimateheatingscenarios. Asmuchasweneedtoinvestinprotectingandrestoring,weshouldalsonotassumethatthesecarbonstoresarepermanent.Inaheatingclimate,forestsincreasinglydiebecauseofdroughts,pests,andfires,whiledecayacceleratesinsoilsreleasingpreviouslystoredcarbon.Newforestsalsogrowtooslowlytohelpusstretchthecarbonbudgetwehaveleft. Technologicalfixes,likeCarbonCaptureStorage(CCS),havenotbeenproventoworkatalargescaleandareextremelycostly.Othertechnologieslikeclimateengineeringandmarinegeoengineeringschemesareevenmorerisky.PlansthatrelyonCCS delayrealclimateactionandhavenoguaranteeofsuccess.Thereisnootherwaytosolvetheclimateemergencythanimmediateandmassivereductioninfossilfuelemissions. Inthelongterm,we’llneednature’shelptoremovecarbonfromtheatmosphere,astoday’slevelofatmosphericcarbonalreadytriggersprocessesthatmustnotbeallowedtoreachapointofnoreturn–theirtippingpoint.Processeslikethethawingofthepermafrost,thediebackoftheAmazon,orthedisintegrationofmajoriceshieldsinplacesliketheArctic. What’swrongwith“NetZero”? NetZeropledgesarebeingreleasednowonanearlydailybasis.Theyassumethatemissionsfromburningcoalcanbecompensated(or‘offset’) inrealtimebyprotectingaforestorplantingtrees,ignoringthefactthatplantsneedtimetogrow,whilstcuttingfossilfuelemissionshasimmediateresults. NetZeropledgesalsoassumethattherearenolimitstocompensateone’sownemissionswithreductionsorincreasedcarbonremovalelsewhere.TheyassumethataddingupallNetZeropledgeswouldgetustothe2050visionofgloballynotemittingmorecarbonthancanbereabsorbed.Butitwon’t. Allthesepledgescompeteforlimitedwaysinwhichcarbonuptakecanbeincreased,likelandforforestrestoration.Forexample,ifcountrieslikeRussia,withmassiveopportunitiesforreforestation,decidetogoforNetZeroemissionsonly–relyingontherestorationofforestsinsteadofcuttingfossilfuelemissions–thiswillnotbeenoughtosolvetheclimatecrisis.Inmanyplaceswewillneedtogofarbeyond‘netzero’tobalanceoutthelandrestrictionsinotherplacesthatlimitopportunitiesforcarbonremoval. TheNetZeroapproachispopularforonesimplereason:it’scheaper.Voluntary‘carboncredits’ fromschemesinvestinginforestprotectionorrestorationcanbeboughtforlessthan$10/tCO2.WhenaEuropeanpowerplantfailstocomplywithitsmandatoryemissionsreductionstargets,itneedstopaymorethan5timesasmuch.Inparticularforcorporations,carboncreditscostthem apitifulamountofmoneywhilsttheycancontinuetheiremissionintensivebusinessasusual,andstillmarketthemselvesasa‘climatechampion’.Thisisnotonlybadforourclimate,it’sunjust,asitoftenputsamassiveburdenonthosemarginalizedcommunitiesmostaffectedbytheclimatecrisis. Whatneedstohappentosolvetheclimatecrisis? Actorsmustkeeptheirplanssimpleandtransparent,withseparatetargetsfor: Rapidreductionsinemissionsfromtheburningoffossilfuelsandotherindustrialactivities.Rapidreductionsinemissionsfromlanduseimpact,mainlyfromdeforestationandviaareductionofmeat&dairyproduction.Increasedcommitmentsandcontributionstorights-basednatureprotectionandrestoration. Weneedallsectorsofsociety,fromgovernmenttobusinesstolocalcommunitiesandIndigenousPeoples,mustworktogetherinjustandequitablewaystourgentlysolvethiscrisis.Wearepartofnature–ifweprotectnatureweprotectourselves. MaikMarahrensisaSeniorCampaignStrategistForestswithGreenpeaceInternational. #Forests #Climate Comments LeaveyourreplyCancelreply Comment* Name* Email* Iagreeonprovidingmyname,emailandcontentsothatmycommentcanbestoredanddisplayedinthewebsite. Postcomment Δ Discussion Ihaveagas-burningstove.Fourpilotsgoingon24-7.ShouldIfindawaytostopthis?Willithelp? Manageyourcookiespreferences Pleaseselectwhichcookiesyouarewillingtostore. First-partycookies(required)Alwaysenabled Thesecookiesarerequiredfortechnicalreasonssothatyoucanvisitourwebsiteandusethefunctionsweoffer.Thesecookiesareusedtorecogniseyoubetweensuccessivevisitsandthusprovideyouwithabetterexperience,storingyourconsentpreferencesandthelastGreenpeace.orgwebsitevisited. Performancecookies Weusetrackingandanalysistoolstoensurecontinuousoptimisationanddemand-orienteddesignofourwebsite.Thesecookieswillallowustocollectstatisticalandanonymiseddata,suchashowvisitorsuseourwebsiteorwhichpagesareaccessedmostfrequently,toultimatelyimproveGreenpeace.organdprovideyouwithabetterexperienceofourwebsite. Marketingcookies InadditiontothePerformancecookiesmentionedabove,wemayalsoplaceinyourbrowsercookiesfromthird-partyservices(e.g.FacebookorGoogle)totracktheeffectivenessofouronlinemarketingstrategiesandtodeliveradvertsmorerelevanttoyouandyourinterests.Thesecookiesmayalsobeusedtoserveadvertisingtoyouafteryouhaveleftoursite(retargetingcookies). Allowall Savepreferences Weusecookiestoenhanceyourexperience.Byclicking“Gotit!”youagreetoourPrivacy&CookiesPolicy.Youcanchangeyourcookiessettingsanytime. Settings Acceptallcookies
延伸文章資訊
- 1Greenpeace chides net-zero road map - Taipei Times
Greenpeace Taiwan yesterday criticized the government's plan to curb carbon emissions, calling it...
- 25 reasons Greenpeace is wrong about carbon credits - DGB ...
According to Greenpeace, without global vigilance around net-zero pledges and offsets, carbon cre...
- 3Alibaba tops Greenpeace China e-commerce ranking for ...
Chinese e-commerce platforms' climate commitments only cover their corporate operations, but the ...
- 4Why Net Zero and Offsets won't solve the climate crisis
Within the climate debate, the biggest deception comes down to a single word: net. Greenpeace Lux...
- 5This is an unofficial machine translation of the French original ...
The association Greenpeace France, an association governed by the ... THE NOTION OF A CARBON NEUT...